WebThe brief facts are as under. 3.The Department of Telecommunications, Government of India, invited tenders from Indian Companies with a view to license the operation of … http://www.dehradunlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/7-Doctrine-of-proportionality-expanding-dimensions-of-judicial-review-in-Indian-context.pdf
P. Ravishankar vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 October, 2024
WebAug 27, 1997 · In Tata Cellular vs. union of India. It was observed by this Court after referring to Brind that the principles available in administrative law were basically illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury unreasonableness) and procedural impropriety. However, it was possible that more grounds could be added in future, - like proportionality. WebIn Tata Cellular v. Union of India 3 (para 113) the Supreme Court laid down the following basic principles relating to administrative law: (SCC pp. 687-88, para 94) ... Where the principle of promissory estoppel applies e.g. in Union of India v. Indo Afghan Agencies Ltd. 43, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P. 44, etc. spanish uniform 1740s
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
WebSep 9, 2024 · THE SUMMARY OF RULE 3 : ... the law laid down in the case of Tata Cellular vrs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 11 lays down the basic principles which still hold the field. WebJun 24, 2024 · Secondly, the Supreme Court discussed the case of Tata Cellular v. Union of India , (1994) 6 SCC 651, wherein it was held that “ the terms of the invitation to tender cannot be open to judicial scrutiny because the invitation to tender is … WebMar 8, 2024 · The Court also relied on the decision of the Apex Court in *Tata cellular Vs Union of India(1994) 6 SCC 651(SC) **which had held that the scope of judicial review of an administrative decision is extremely limited and can only be exercised to scrutinize the decision making process. tea tree oil for fleas dog