First round review by topic editor

Author: qryo

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 13, 2024 · This month, Tools apps still took the first place in the ad volume with 17.2%, a small increase compared to February. Shop apps took the first place in the number of App volume with 13.4% and its ... WebAnswer (1 of 16): In my field, it is common for the first round of review to take about 3 months and an editor is not likely to take seriously a request to hurry the process before that. Everyone needs their papers published quickly — for graduate school applications, for job applications, for an...

Best Practices: Guidelines for Editors and Associate Editors

WebAnswer: You alluded to the answer in your question. The First Round Blog is our place on the web to share information and announcements about First Round and our … WebDec 6, 2024 · Camille Ricketts is managing editor at First Round Review. I asked for her advice on how to build a much-loved online magazine … list of got episodes wikipedia

Golden State Warriors vs. Sacramento Kings NBA Playoffs series …

WebFeb 17, 2024 · One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well. WebThe first round of peer review takes place after you’ve designed your study, but before you’ve collected or analyzed any data. This allows you to get feedback on both the question you’re looking to answer, and the … WebThe First Read-Through. Following the invitation to review, when you'll have received the article abstract, you should already understand the aims, key data and conclusions of the manuscript. If you don't, make a note … imaly repair

Reviewers Guidelines IEEE Communications Society

In the first round of review, we received the following decision. If …

WebDec 28, 2015 · Popular answers (1) In my experience you can challenge an editor’s decision when the review is clearly biased. When challenging the decision you may … WebOct 16, 2014 · 3- The professional capacity, experience and knowledge of the reviewers. 4- The professionalism of the editor. 5- The publishing rules of the journal. 6- The experience, seriousness and knowledge... im always the bad guyWebApr 21, 2024 · Journal's first round review decision: "While the reviewers found the paper interesting, they all agreed that very extensive revisions will be necessary if the … imalys.com 03 21 57 28 37

"WebThe first round of peer review takes place after you’ve designed your study, but before you’ve collected or analyzed any data. This allows you to get feedback on both the question you’re looking to answer, and the experiment you’ve designed to test it. " - First round review by topic editor

First round review by topic editor

When should you challenge an editors decision to reject a paper?

WebIt is rare for manuscripts to be recommended “as is” in the first round of review. If the Editor does not agree with the AE’s recommendation, the Editor may return the … WebConcluding the First Reading After the initial read and using your notes, including those of any major flaws you found, draft the first two paragraphs of your review - the first summarizing the research question addressed and the second the contribution of the work.

Did you know?

Web16. 7. 53. 87. Duration first review round is the time between submission of a manuscript and the moment the editor informs the author (s) about the outcome of the first peer review round. More information: Huisman & Smits, 2024. ‘Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective’, Scientometrics, 113 (1), pp. 633-650. WebReview guidelines. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. Second, you should determine in about 10 minutes whether the paper is a definite reject.

WebJun 8, 2024 · We spoke with First Round Review’s editor, Jessi Craige Shikman, about how she structures a lean team, how it consistently generates high-quality content ideas, … WebApr 7, 2024 · Tiger Woods tees off his second round at 12:54 p.m. ET alongside two players at the top of the leaderboard after Thursday's first round. Co-leader Viktor Hovland was tied with Jon Rahm and Brooks ...

WebWhen a journal first receives your submission, there are typically two separate checks to confirm that the paper is appropriate and ready for peer review: Technical check. Performed by a technical editor to ensure that … WebJan 5, 2024 · Meaning of Decision in Process after Required Reviews Completed in the first round of peer review ... Topics under this stage ... So, a change to Decision in Process after the peer review means the Associate/Managing Editor (AE/ME) has looked at the reviewers’ comments, made their decision on the paper based on those comments, …

WebApr 9, 2024 · Possible outcomes of peer review. The journal’s editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and uses this information to …

WebFeb 17, 2024 · Modified 4 years, 1 month ago. Viewed 2k times. 5. I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of … im always with you cardinal svgWebWebflow’s Path to Product-Market Fit — Lessons on Creating a Market with Rigorous Customer Empathy. Webflow’s Bryant Chou tells the story of how he and his co-founders leaned into the power of customer empathy to create the leading visual development platform for building powerful websites without writing code. The Secret to an In Sync ... list of gothic kingsWebApr 6, 2024 · Pending review = The paper is due to be pre-checked. Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by … imalys.com beuvryWebDec 28, 2015 · One can always object to the editor decision and the referee report. But this usually leads to nothing. The best is that when the author writes a report objecting the editor decision, he/she... im a lyrical dancer lyricsWebApr 6, 2024 · Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by the Academic Editor. It usually takes around 48 hours. Pending major or minor revisions = Author revisions are in progress. Pending editor decision = The Academic Editor is making a final decision. imalwintechWebThe review process should be timely and fair. Editors should assign reviewers immediately after receiving a new paper, and send personal emails to overdue reviewers (the … imamae:9080/workplaceWebNov 8, 2015 · In my opinion, first round decides whether the quality and technicality of the paper is considerable or not. If yes, then reviewer provides his/her minor and major comments. In second round of review, first reviewer checks whether all his/her comments have been addressed or not. Is the paper now seems reason to accept? list of gout friendly foods